EP686 | ๐ธ๏ธ
- The July correction was mainly caused by crowded positioning and excessive leverage; industry demand, price increases, and higher ASPs did not weaken at the same time. If a genuine fundamental reversal emerges, its destructive force could be much greater.
- Although being fully invested in tech stocks can generate impressive returns during a bull market, it may also magnify losses the next time AI capital spending pauses or the market deleverages. Diversification and hedging deserve to be reassessed.
- In U.S. stocks, capital is currently favoring software and optical communications. In Taiwan, the focus is on whether optical communications, thermal management, power supplies, and related sectors can advance from a rebound to new all-time highs.
- When assessing market themes, distinguish real supply and demand from exaggerated narratives. For example, shortening memory delivery times is more likely to reflect accelerated fulfillment amid tight supply than disappearing demand.
The July Correction Was a Risk Warning, Not an Industry Fundamental Collapse
The host believes that after Taiwan stocks moved sideways at a key level, the market quickly interpreted the decline as a crash. But the more reasonable explanation for now is concentrated positioning and excessive leverage. After the nonfarm payrolls data was released, fears of higher interest rates intensified, causing prices to fall sharply. However, looking at industry orders, rising component prices, and company revenue, there is not yet evidence of a broad-based weakening. This pullback therefore looks more like an early warning, reminding investors to check how much loss their positions can withstand.
What really deserves attention is that this decline was not caused by collapsing demand. If excessively crowded positioning alone can produce such a large drawdown, then the decline could be even deeper when the AI investment cycle actually takes a pause and fundamentals begin to change. The host remains positive on long-term AI demand, but no longer equates โbeing in the right industryโ with โstock prices always going up.โ Instead, he sees this correction as an opportunity to reassess risk.
From Being Fully Invested in Tech Stocks to a Portfolio You Can Sleep With
The host used to prefer concentrating his capital in tech stocks because concentrated holdings can generate higher capital returns in a bull market. But as his assets and family responsibilities grew, he began to understand why hedge funds and all-weather portfolios exist. Investors do not necessarily have to pursue the highest possible return. They can also trade away some upside for a smaller drawdown, so that a market decline does not force them to cancel family trips, disrupt daily life, or interrupt long-term investment plans.
This approach can include reducing concentration in a single industry, allocating to assets with lower correlation, or using long-short strategies to reduce overall market beta. Put simply, when going long on preferred investments, investors can also pair them with short positions equal to roughly 30%, 50%, or 70%, so the overall portfolio is not fully exposed to the marketโs direction. These strategies are more complex and are not suitable for everyone, but the core idea is to first decide how much loss you are willing to bear.
The host also revisited index allocation. TSMC can be viewed as a relatively stable tech core, while 0050 can serve as a tool for reducing individual-stock risk when the market becomes volatile. The point is not to exit tech stocks completely, but to avoid having to liquidate everything at once when the market becomes bumpy. Reducing positions first and increasing exposure to indexes or defensive assets may be more effective than panic-selling afterward.
U.S. Capital Returns to Software and Optical Communications as Taiwan Awaits Confirmation of a New Leader
After the correction, the clearest directions for returning capital in U.S. stocks were software and optical communications. Palantir and Cloudflare rose strongly after reporting earnings. Even though the market generally considers these companies highly valued, investors were still willing to chase them. The host sees this as a signal that growth stocks are regaining control: high valuation alone does not necessarily prevent a stock from rising. As long as the market believes future growth can continue, valuations may keep expanding.
Optical communications shows signs of sector rotation. It was one of the earlier groups in this supply chain to take a breather during the current cycle, followed by a period of weakness in thermal management. Now optical communications has strengthened first, with thermal management recovering afterward, suggesting that the market may be rotating back through sectors in the same order as their earlier declines. Many Taiwan optical communications companies are Tier 2 or Tier 3 suppliers. They may not occupy the most critical positions, but they can still benefit as overall demand expands. What truly deserves attention is not a short-term surge, but whether these stocks can break above their previous highs and sustain the advance, turning a rebound into a new major uptrend.
The host noted that material supplies upstream in optical communications remain a constraint. Even though Taiwanese and U.S. companies are confident in their access to raw materials, financial figures still indicate shortages in some parts of the chain. This means that if demand continues, prices and orders may still have room to rise. Capital may later rotate through optical communications, thermal management, power supplies, and other components in sequence. But until new highs are confirmed, investors should not chase a stock simply because it has been strong for a few days.
Price Increases and Supply-Chain Demand Persist, but Market Narratives Are Often Exaggerated
Sign up to keep reading
11 more sections await โ finish reading on Podket.
Sign up freeFree to read. No credit card required.
Tickers are shown only because the company was mentioned in this episode, for your reference. Not investment advice, not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Disclaimer: The above is an AI-generated summary of a third-party programme, may contain errors or omissions, and is provided for personal, non-commercial reference only. Podket accepts no responsibility for its content and makes no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, completeness, quality, timeliness or reliability, and expressly disclaims any liability for any loss or damage arising from all or part of it. The content may reflect the personal opinions and views of the original programme's author and does not represent the position of Podket. Nothing in it constitutes any solicitation, offer, opinion or recommendation by Podket for any investment, nor legal, tax, accounting or investment advice or services regarding the returns or suitability of any security or investment. Investors must make their own investment decisions in light of their own investment objectives and financial circumstances.