EP676 | 🐬

Market Correction Shakeout and Concentration of Strong Sectors

Following a minor market correction, capital flows have shown a clear pattern of re-concentration. Many short-term traders executing momentum or limit-up strategies experienced notable drawdowns during the dip. Consequently, as the market began rebounding toward breakeven or entry costs, a wave of panic-selling ensued as retail investors rushed to cut losses or exit flat. This defensive selling created immediate overhead resistance, causing temporary choppy trading. However, once these impatient "weak hands" are completely shaken out, the market's collective buying power is expected to reassert itself. A push to new index highs will officially signal the end of the consolidation phase.

During this sector reshuffle, passive components and power devices have emerged as the fastest sectors to rebound. Although investors buying into these rallies might face short-term consolidation or volatility shakeouts, institutional order flows confirm that these two groups are the primary targets of major market capital. As long as the broader market maintains its bullish structure, these leading groups are highly likely to exhibit more sustained, trending behavior once the floating supply is fully digested.

Worsening Power Device Shortages and the July Price-Hike Wave

Recent supply chain feedback from ODM and EMS manufacturers points to an "elephant in the room" that the broader market has largely overlooked: a severe supply deficit in power devices (MOSFETs). While market attention has spent months heavily focused on passive components, lead times for various power devices have quietly stretched to extreme levels, with some downstream applications experiencing absolute stockouts. This structural tightness is translating directly into pricing, with the industry poised to issue a dense wave of price-increase notifications throughout July.

Nonetheless, investors should remain objective. Pricing increases at the industry level do not automatically guarantee unlimited stock price appreciation, as many power-device names have already rallied several fold in anticipation. In terms of market structure, global players operating under the IDM model (Integrated Device Manufacturer) hold a distinct advantage because they own in-house design, fabrication, and packaging capacity. For Taiwan's local Fabless design houses, the ability to secure allocation through parent companies or corporate group resources will be the critical differentiator determining who actually profits from this pricing cycle.

AI Demand Spills Over, Triggering Surges in Packaging and Testing Quotes

The insatiable demand for AI is triggering massive capacity crowding-out effects that have officially spilled over into the packaging and testing (assembly and test) sector. Historically dismissed as a mature, low-growth business, packaging has transformed into the primary bottleneck determining whether hardware can ship at all. Driven by extreme capacity constraints in TSMC's2330.TW advanced packaging, the entire backend supply chain has gained immense pricing power, undergoing a fundamental valuation rerating.

According to internal quoting data from IC design houses, backend packaging firms are demanding astonishing price hikes for the upcoming quarter. During the COVID-19 pandemic, packaging price increases typically hovered around 10% to 20%. In this cycle, however, some design houses are receiving next-quarter quotes with abrupt increases of 30%, 40%, or even 50%. This aggressive pricing is possible because packaging facilities now have total luxury in choosing their clients; those unwilling or unable to pay the premium are instantly bypassed for queued AI orders. The recent strength of dominant packaging and testing giants like ASE Technology Holding3711.TW and King Yuan Electronics2449.TW is a direct reflection of this sweeping repricing across mature-node and power-device packaging.

Meta's Neo Cloud: An "AI Double Down" to Monetize Legacy Compute

Recent announcements regarding Meta's$META push into building a Neo Cloud (leasing out redundant compute capacity) have been widely met with pessimistic interpretations, with some analysts claiming it signals Zuckerberg's exit from the AI arms race. However, based on core industry data and internal company dynamics, Meta's actual intent is to "Double Down." Rather than dumping excess compute as a last resort, Meta views this as an active commercial venture to monetize legacy infrastructure to fund aggressive future expansion.